Process optimization in breast imaging: Exploring advanced roles for medical radiation technologists.

INTRODUCTION: Medical imaging (MI) is a critical service that underpins the care journey for many who enter the healthcare system. The subspecialty of Breast Imaging (BI) represents a complex and multi-modality MI setting with a well-defined role in the healthcare system. BI holds great potential as a setting to consider opportunities for a medical radiation technologist's (MRT) current role to be modified and leveraged to fulfill novel and advanced roles to optimize patient-centered service. METHODS: This study was conducted in three interrelated BI clinics, all at large urban academic hospitals with a common operational infrastructure. It involved three phases; (i) mapping processes and workflows in BI (ii) identification and characterization of care delivery problems (CDPs) within these process maps, and prioritization of opportunities where task shifting might leverage enhanced knowledge, skills, and judgement of MRTs to optimize care. The PEPPA framework - a systematic planning tool for the development and implementation of advanced practice nursing (APN) roles5 - was used, with the first five of nine steps considered in scope for this pilot project. RESULTS: Twelve distinct BI processes were identified and mapped as swimlane charts; a single clerical workflow leading up to patient check-in to the BI department, and 11 subsequent clinical processes. Each map included swimlanes for MRTs, radiologists, and clerical staff, as relevant, and included processes ranging from routine mammogram and ultrasound orders to stereotactic-guided core biopsies and rapid diagnostic workflows. Across the maps, 9 CDPs were identified; scheduling, radiologist availability, incorrect orders, and coordination of externally-acquired imaging and consults. The inpatient process map had the most instances of CDP identified, and the radiologist availability CDP was flagged most frequently across processes. Characterization of the root causes of each CDP led to common reflections on team and task factors, including inefficiencies in communication or division of responsibilities, or availability of resources or team members to support workflows. Consultations based on the resultant maps and CDPs led to identification of the following potential advanced roles for MRTs; review and decision-making relating to imaging acquired externally prior to patient appointments, exam ordering and protocoling in defined scenarios, and task-shifting of certain clinical procedures such as breast screening ultrasounds and contrast-enhanced mammography. CONCLUSION: Advanced practice for MRTs holds great potential to address system inefficiencies in breast imaging, if approached systematically and with the primary objective to optimize care. Future work will consider trial and evaluation of pilot roles that incorporate advanced opportunities identified in this project.

A new species of the sun coral genus Tubastraea (Scleractinia: Dendrophylliidae) from Hong Kong.

Tubastraea, commonly known as sun coral, is a genus of brightly coloured azooxanthellate corals in the family Dendrophylliidae. The diversity of this genus is low, with only seven recognized species. Herein, we describe Tubastraea megacorallita sp. nov. from Hong Kong based on morphological and molecular analyses. This new species exhibits several characteristics of the genus including being colonial, having a rough texture of corallum and no epitheca. It can be distinguished from its congenerics by bigger corallites, and the Pourtals plan arrangement of its septa. The rDNA gene sequences (consisting of ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 18S and 28S) showed 2.455.18% divergence from those of its closest relatives, T. coccinea and T. micranthus.

"I'm Just Guessing These Answers!" An Evaluation of the (In)Accuracy of Patient-Reported Medical History Collected as Part of a Breast Imaging Program.

INTRODUCTION: Hundreds of thousands of Ontario women receive breast screening imaging each year. The patient's medical history is a vital tool used to personalize breast screening approaches. This study evaluated the accuracy of self-reported medical and imaging history in patients about to receive breast imaging procedures in a large urban Canadian hospital. The patient experience with using a blank screening form vs. a novel prefilled screening form was also evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 compared patient-reported information (via the blank screening form) to information previously captured in the Radiology Information and Picture Archiving Communication Systems to assess data accuracy. In phase 2, study questionnaires were used to collect data on the patients' experience with the screening form in two cohorts (between the blank and a novel prefilled screening form). RESULTS: Data accuracy: for mammography (n = 60), 40% of the patients could accurately recall when and where their last mammogram was performed. For breast ultrasound (n = 43) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (n = 20), significantly fewer patients could accurately recall the date their last test was performed (14% and 10%, respectively). Of those who had previous breast surgery (n = 18), 100% were able to recall whether the surgery resulted in a benign or malignant diagnosis, and 61% were able to accurately recall the year they had the breast surgery. PATIENT EXPERIENCE: Of the returned questionnaires, 65 provided feedback on the blank screening form while 55 provided feedback on the prefilled form. Ninety percent preferred to fill out the new prefilled screening form. The themes acknowledged a general improvement in the screening form, a decrease in frustration associated with having to recall their medical history, and the patients felt that the institution better understood their medical history. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this research indicate that asking patients to complete a blank medical screening form is a highly inaccurate method of gathering that important information. When that information was prefilled for the patient to review and update, patient frustration and stress were decreased, while satisfaction and confidence in the organization were increased.